Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 535 U.S. 1110 (2002)
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 535 U.S. 1110 (2002), 535 U.S. 1110 (2002)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2002-01-01
- Topic
- general
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 535 U.S. 1110 (2002) JUNE 3, 2002 (For opinion of JUSTICE SCALIA dissenting from grants of applications for stays of execution in No. 01A834, ante, p. 1044, and No. 01A853, ante, p. 1050, see ante, p. 1044.) No. 01A768 OSTOPOSIDES ET AL. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (GLIMP ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST). Ct. App. Cal., 2d App.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 535 U.S. 1110 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS,535 U.S. 1110(2002)
JUNE 3, 2002
No. 01A768 OSTOPOSIDES ET AL. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (GLIMP ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST). Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE SCALIA and referred to the Court, denied.
No. D-2234 IN THE RE DISBARMENT OF LITTLE. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see531 U.S. 1122.]
No. 01M61 O'GRADY v. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; and
No. 01M62 MORRISON v. GOODMAN ET AL. Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 01M63 BOWERS v. ILLINOIS. Motion to direct the Clerk to file an original action denied.
No. 01-1229 PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON v. GUILLEN, LEGAL GUARDIAN OF GUILLEN ET AL, MINORS, ET AL. Sup.Ct.Page 1111Wash. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1033.] Motion of the United States to intervene granted. Motion of respondents Whitmer to determine party status granted, and it is determined that the Whitmers are not parties under this Court's Rule 12.6, but they may file a brief asamicicuriae.
No. 01-8796 WESTINE v. STEPP, WARDEN. C.A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceedin forma pauperisdenied.
No. 01-9423 TAYLOR v. PEARL CRUISES ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceedinforma pauperisdenied. Petitioner is allowed until June 24, 2002, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 01-10019 IN RE BERRY. Petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 01-9426 IN RE WELLS. Petition for a writ of mandamus denied.
No. 01-9372 IN RE ROBERTSON; and
No. 01-9499 IN RE OTIS. Petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.