Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Diaz-Paulino v. United States
534 U.S. 1071
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2001-12-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that “[sjummary judgment is not appropriate if there is a genuine factual dispute relating to whether the defendants committed acts that allegedly violated clearly established rights”
- primary violation element of a Section 20(a) claim was satisfied where plaintiffs adequately pleaded Section 10(b) claim
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Diaz-Paulino v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.