Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Eduardo R. v. Wisconsin
533 U.S. 936
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2001-06-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- adopting federal standard for determining ex post facto applications of the law, i.e., "whether the change alters the definition of criminal conduct or increases the penalty"
- Retroactive application of law requiring registration of sex offenders and public notification did not violate state and federal ex post facto clauses.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eduardo R. v. Wisconsin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 59 opinions
Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.