Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

532 U.S. 967

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2001-04-13
Topic: bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

defendant could not challenge the admissibility of photographs that had been admitted in the circuit court because he failed to make an objection
"The inconsistencies between the[ ] statutes and regulations and the resultant uncertainty as to who may or may not participate in the race-based ... program preclude a finding of narrow tailoring."

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 7 opinions

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certio *968 rari granted, ante, p. 941.] The order granting the petition for writ of certiorari is- amended to read as follows: Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: “1. Whether the Court of Appeals misapplied the strict scrutiny standard in determining if Congress had a compelling interest to enact legislation designed to remedy the effects of racial discrimination? 2. Whether the United States Department of Transportation’s current Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest?”