Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Williams v. Dormire

532 U.S. 931

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2001-03-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • assuming the clerk limited any conversation to administrative and logistical matters
  • “There is no question . . . that defendants satisfied the first prong . . . because African-Americans are unquestionably a ‘distinct’ group for purposes of [this] analysis”
  • “[T]his Court is not required to pass upon a constitutional issue unless it affirmatively appears that the issue was raised and determined in the trial court.” (quotations and citations omitted)
  • Apprendi does not make the North Carolina capital sentencing scheme unconstitutional because the State does not have to notify a defendant prior to trial of the aggravating factors upon which the State intends to rely

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Williams v. Dormire. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
167 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.