Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Moghadam v. United States
Moghadam v. United States, 529 U.S. 1036 (2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2000-03-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the FRSA, by virtue of 23 CFR §§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4) (1999), preempts state tort claims concerning a railroad’s failure to maintain adequate warning devices at crossings where federal funds have participated in the installation of the devices
- Dr. Martell testified as expert in field of forensic neu-ropsychology
- Dr. Martell testified as expert in field of forensic neuropsychology
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moghadam v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.