Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Hugo P. v. George P.

526 U.S. 1034

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-03-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "As the trier of fact, [the judge] was in the best position to evaluate all the evidence, contradictory at times"
  • “The authority to order an alternate plan is implicit in the authority to approve or disapprove a plan in accordance with the evidence presented”
  • plan proposed by parent not entitled to any artificial weight in determining best interests of child
  • judge has obligation to consider DCF's proposed plan but must make determination based on child's best interests
  • in considering widest range of permissible evidence in child custody cases, court should not give presumptive consideration to one factor or another when Legislature has not recognized a presumption as such
  • trial judge is in best position to evaluate evidence

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hugo P. v. George P.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
76 opinions

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Motion of National Association of Counsel for Children for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of petitioner to strike affidavit from appendix to George P.’s brief in opposition denied. Certiorari denied.