Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ramires v. United States
525 U.S. 1112
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1999-01-19
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that district court judges have “wide latitude” under Confrontation Clause to “impose reasonable limits” on cross examination and limit “interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant”
- “Juries are presumed to follow their instructions.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
- "where there is substantial evidence of a defendant's participation in the conspiracy * * *, 'the significance of his withdrawal relates only to the * * * subsequent acts and declarations of coconspirators.' "
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ramires v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 70 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.