Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ramires v. United States

525 U.S. 1112

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-01-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that district court judges have “wide latitude” under Confrontation Clause to “impose reasonable limits” on cross examination and limit “interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant”
  • “Juries are presumed to follow their instructions.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
  • "where there is substantial evidence of a defendant's participation in the conspiracy * * *, 'the significance of his withdrawal relates only to the * * * subsequent acts and declarations of coconspirators.' "

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ramires v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
70 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.