Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda

Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda, 524 U.S. 930 (1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-06-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that “[t]he purpose of allocution is to permit the defendant to speak on his [or her] own behalf or present any information in mitigation of punishment”
  • determining whether the relationship is fiduciary under Section 523(a)(4) is an issue of Federal law for which state law can be consulted
  • rejecting the notion that torture or serious physical abuse needs further definition
  • "[i]n a murder case, the trial court must instruct the jury on every lesser included homicide offense supported by the evidence.”
  • “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” is act involving “torture or serious physical abuse beyond that necessary to produce death” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • upholding the especially heinous, atrocious and cruel aggravating circumstance

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
107 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.