Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda
Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda, 524 U.S. 930 (1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1998-06-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that “[t]he purpose of allocution is to permit the defendant to speak on his [or her] own behalf or present any information in mitigation of punishment”
- determining whether the relationship is fiduciary under Section 523(a)(4) is an issue of Federal law for which state law can be consulted
- rejecting the notion that torture or serious physical abuse needs further definition
- "[i]n a murder case, the trial court must instruct the jury on every lesser included homicide offense supported by the evidence.”
- “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” is act involving “torture or serious physical abuse beyond that necessary to produce death” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- upholding the especially heinous, atrocious and cruel aggravating circumstance
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 107 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.