Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Heaton v. United States

Heaton v. United States, 523 U.S. 1031 (1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-03-23
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “[The defendant] reads [‘genital opening’] to require vaginal penetration, but that is simply not the requirement found in the statute.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Heaton v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.