Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court

522 U.S. 935

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-10-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that a union “cannot acquiesce in a company’s prohibited employment discrimination and expect to evade Title VII liability . . .”
  • stating that where the alleged retaliation “occurs prior to the filing of a charge and the employee fails to allege the retaliatory act or a retaliation claim in the subsequent charge, the retaliatory act ordinarily will not reasonably relate to the charge”
  • the seventeen-year-old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck, drove him to a secluded area, and shot him three times in the head
  • defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
  • defendant kidnapped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
  • The seventeen year old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
  • a plaintiff may seek judicial consideration of discrimination claims not identified in EEOC charge if omitted claims are reasonably related to the allegations in the charge
  • testimony of debtor as to debts owed

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
106 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.