Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court
522 U.S. 935
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-10-20
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that a union “cannot acquiesce in a company’s prohibited employment discrimination and expect to evade Title VII liability . . .”
- stating that where the alleged retaliation “occurs prior to the filing of a charge and the employee fails to allege the retaliatory act or a retaliation claim in the subsequent charge, the retaliatory act ordinarily will not reasonably relate to the charge”
- the seventeen-year-old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck, drove him to a secluded area, and shot him three times in the head
- defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
- defendant kidnapped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
- The seventeen year old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
- a plaintiff may seek judicial consideration of discrimination claims not identified in EEOC charge if omitted claims are reasonably related to the allegations in the charge
- testimony of debtor as to debts owed
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 106 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.