Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
519 U.S. 1149
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-02-24
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that National Guard and Reserve Service require only 15 and 14 days, respectively, of active duty training each year
- “[Njothing in the language of § 3730 suggests that its protections are limited to those who were motivated by it”
- finding it not “self-evident that the police offend general fourth-amendment principles when they allow members of the news media to enter someone’s house during the execution of a search warrant”
- “FLSA case law is clear that the employer bears the burden of demonstrating its right to an exemption"
- federal law and regulations exist that preempt questions of railroad abandonment of the Carondelet Branch
- retaliatory discharge is a clearly established First Amendment violation
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 62 opinions
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.