Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

519 U.S. 1149

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-02-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that National Guard and Reserve Service require only 15 and 14 days, respectively, of active duty training each year
  • “[Njothing in the language of § 3730 suggests that its protections are limited to those who were motivated by it”
  • finding it not “self-evident that the police offend general fourth-amendment principles when they allow members of the news media to enter someone’s house during the execution of a search warrant”
  • “FLSA case law is clear that the employer bears the burden of demonstrating its right to an exemption"
  • federal law and regulations exist that preempt questions of railroad abandonment of the Carondelet Branch
  • retaliatory discharge is a clearly established First Amendment violation

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
62 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.