Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mendez-Rosas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Mendez-Rosas v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 519 U.S. 1061 (1997)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-01-06
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
How later courts describe this case
- stating that a court has no duty to impose a sentence considered appropriate under the Sentencing Guidelines
- holding that § 440(a) applies retroactively to appeals that were pending before the circuit court when the AEDPA became law because § 440(a) “speaks to .the power of the court, rather than to the rights or obligations of the parties”
- stating court -9- J-S70035-18 may overlook appellant’s failure to provide Rule 2119(f
- “It is well-established that a sentencing court can impose a sentence that is the maximum period authorized by the statute.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mendez-Rosas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 57 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.