Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.

518 U.S. 1020

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-06-24
Topic
intellectual-property-and-technology

How later courts describe this case

  • “The claimed composition is defined as comprising — meaning containing at least — five specific ingredients”
  • appellate court “properly defers” to trial court on motion for a new trial
  • “Although we accept underlying fact findings unless they are clearly erroneous, ‘the determination of whether those facts satisfy the legal test of exigency is subject to de novo review.’ ”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
72 opinions

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.