Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tucker v. New Jersey State Prison

Tucker v. N.J. State Prison, 516 U.S. 977 (1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-11-13
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that any error in the admission of evidence is harmless when like evidence was presented to the jury through other means
  • holding that the appellant's complaint about the prosecution's statements during voir dire were waived because the appellant did not object to them at the time
  • stating that to preserve an objection for prosecutorial misconduct one must not only object but also request an instruction to disregard and move for a mistrial
  • upholding heinous, atrocious or cruel aggravator even though victim did not suffer serious physical abuse where she was subjected to extreme mental cruelty
  • "The party proffering the expert witness bears the burden of showing that the witness is qualified on the specific matter in question.”
  • special instruction singling out the issue of mental retardation in determining the voluntariness of a confession
  • spe-cial instruction singling out the issue of mental retardation in determining the vol-untariness of a confession
  • record must demonstrate prejudice in community making likelihood of obtaining a fair trial doubtful

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tucker v. New Jersey State Prison. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
150 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.