Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ernst & Young v. Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp.

Ernst & Young v. R.I. Depositors Econ. Prot. Corp., 516 U.S. 975 (1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-11-13
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding plaintiffs “position in the hierarchy of a particularly influential and violent La Cosa Nostra family” to be “highly material to the protection of individual privacy interests”
  • “One who asserts that a law different from that of Oklahoma governs the dispute bears the burden of identifying and invoking that other law.”
  • the Bureau's subpoena power may even, in an appropriate case, extend to out of state witnesses
  • retrospectivity alone does not render statute violative of due process

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ernst & Young v. Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
51 opinions

Sup. Ct. R. I. Cer-tiorari denied.