Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ernst & Young v. Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp.
Ernst & Young v. R.I. Depositors Econ. Prot. Corp., 516 U.S. 975 (1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-11-13
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- finding plaintiffs “position in the hierarchy of a particularly influential and violent La Cosa Nostra family” to be “highly material to the protection of individual privacy interests”
- “One who asserts that a law different from that of Oklahoma governs the dispute bears the burden of identifying and invoking that other law.”
- the Bureau's subpoena power may even, in an appropriate case, extend to out of state witnesses
- retrospectivity alone does not render statute violative of due process
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ernst & Young v. Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 51 opinions
Sup. Ct. R. I. Cer-tiorari denied.