Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Spinner v. County of Los Angeles
516 U.S. 832
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-10-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that an appointment book and application form containing the defendant’s name were not inadmissible hearsay because they were admitted to explain how the defendant became a part of the police investigation
- holding appointment book and patient application form were not hearsay when tendered to show how appellant became a suspect in the investigation
- Prosecutor stated that defense counsel "wants to mislead you a little bit by saying...."
- jury charge not defective which omitted culpable mental state in application paragraph where definition given in abstract portion of charge
- "the charge must contain an accurate statement of the law and must set out all the essential elements of the offense."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Spinner v. County of Los Angeles. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 143 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.