Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.

Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 516 U.S. 824 (1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-10-02
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that review of fees was necessary in all class action settlements to prevent both abuse of appearance and public misunderstanding
  • overturning nationwide class settlement but noting that courts have certified nationwide class actions relying on capacity for court to decertify or redefine class subsequently if case becomes unmanageable
  • “Although it is alleged that the officers made statements under the threat of job loss, these statements were not used against them in any criminal proceeding.”
  • "[A]lthough it is alleged that the officers made statements under the threat of job loss, these statements were not used against them in any criminal proceeding."
  • "One sign that a settlement may not be fair is that some segments of the class are treated differently from others.”
  • describing "fiduciary responsibility" of courts in class actions

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
113 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.