Calhoun v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

How later courts describe this case

• concluding that "[r]umor, speculation, beliefs, conclusions, innuendo, suspicion, opinion, and similar non-factual matters" do not ordinarily satisfy the requirements for disqualification
• holding, as a matter of law, that necessity defense does not apply to abortion protesters who violate preliminary injunction
• failure to warn claim preempted; strict liability claim based on off-label use of Class III medical device not preempted
• failure to warn claims against manufacturer of non-PMA Class III device preempted; design defect not before the court
• “Incidental restrictions of First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association are permissible if reasonably necessary to accomplish the essential needs of the state and public order.”