Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Raitport v. American Telephone & Telegraph

514 U.S. 1032

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-03-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating “we need not and do not reach” the issue of whether the tolling provision was ex post facto
  • finding Pennsylvania’s prevailing wage law was not preempted because it had only “incidental and insignificant relations” to ERISA plans
  • ERISA does not preempt statute requiring public contractors to pay prevailing minimum wage calculated with reference to employer contributions to fringe benefit plans

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Raitport v. American Telephone & Telegraph. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
54 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Con-nor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.