Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Savage

513 U.S. 820

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-10-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • error in excluding defense evidence harmless where substance of excluded evidence was eventually allowed into evidence
  • multiple bank fraud charges were not multiplicitous where they related to a series of fraudulently obtained loans
  • each time an identifiable sum of money is obtained by a specific fraudulent transaction, there is likely to be a separate execution of a scheme to defraud
  • officer may use deadly force where he has probable cause to believe that the suspect "poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer"
  • in order to prove knowledge based on alleged “willful blindness,” it must be shown that the defendant was aware of a high probability of the fact in question and deliberately avoided learning the fact; mere negligence is not enough
  • limiting the reasonableness inquiry to the moments force was used
  • conspiracy may be a continuing. agreement

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Savage. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
63 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.