Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Savage
513 U.S. 820
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-10-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- error in excluding defense evidence harmless where substance of excluded evidence was eventually allowed into evidence
- multiple bank fraud charges were not multiplicitous where they related to a series of fraudulently obtained loans
- each time an identifiable sum of money is obtained by a specific fraudulent transaction, there is likely to be a separate execution of a scheme to defraud
- officer may use deadly force where he has probable cause to believe that the suspect "poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer"
- in order to prove knowledge based on alleged “willful blindness,” it must be shown that the defendant was aware of a high probability of the fact in question and deliberately avoided learning the fact; mere negligence is not enough
- limiting the reasonableness inquiry to the moments force was used
- conspiracy may be a continuing. agreement
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Savage. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 63 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.