Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Belknap v. Henderson
513 U.S. 1014
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-11-28
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- viewing a criminal prosecution and an overlapping forfeiture action to be part of "a single, coordinated prosecution"
- upholding district court’s imposition of 3-day limit for each party to present its case
- "In the management of its docket, the court has an inherent right to place reasonable limitations on the time allotted to any given trial.”
- civil forfeiture of proceeds from illegal activity was not “punishment” and, thus, double jeopardy clause was not implicated
- where judicial lien fixes upon homestead, but is unenforceable because exemption has no value limitation, lien may be avoided because it clouds title, impairing ability to convey property
- double jeopardy does not attach in civil forfeiture to bar subsequent criminal action
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Belknap v. Henderson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 92 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.