Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Belknap v. Henderson

513 U.S. 1014

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-11-28
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • viewing a criminal prosecution and an overlapping forfeiture action to be part of "a single, coordinated prosecution"
  • upholding district court’s imposition of 3-day limit for each party to present its case
  • "In the management of its docket, the court has an inherent right to place reasonable limitations on the time allotted to any given trial.”
  • civil forfeiture of proceeds from illegal activity was not “punishment” and, thus, double jeopardy clause was not implicated
  • where judicial lien fixes upon homestead, but is unenforceable because exemption has no value limitation, lien may be avoided because it clouds title, impairing ability to convey property
  • double jeopardy does not attach in civil forfeiture to bar subsequent criminal action

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Belknap v. Henderson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
92 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.