Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington

Lummi Indian Tribe v. Wash., 507 U.S. 1051 (1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-04-26
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the filing of a claim waives the right to jury trial and an Article III judge.
  • denying writ of mandamus because it was not clear and indisputable that petitioner was entitled to jury trial
  • creditor that files a contingent claim specifically reserving right to jury trial has submitted to bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction
  • we can affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record, even if the district court did not rely on that basis
  • creditor who has filed a contingent claim couched in “protective language” still “has submitted to the bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction and waived any Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
  • Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County
  • denial of motion for reconsideration

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
86 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.