Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington

507 U.S. 1051

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-04-26
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the filing of a claim waives the right to jury trial and an Article III judge.
  • denying writ of mandamus because it was not clear and indisputable that petitioner was entitled to jury trial
  • creditor that files a contingent claim specifically reserving right to jury trial has submitted to bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction
  • we can affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record, even if the district court did not rely on that basis
  • creditor who has filed a contingent claim couched in “protective language” still “has submitted to the bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction and waived any Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
  • Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County
  • denial of motion for reconsideration

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
86 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.