Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington
507 U.S. 1051
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-04-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the filing of a claim waives the right to jury trial and an Article III judge.
- denying writ of mandamus because it was not clear and indisputable that petitioner was entitled to jury trial
- creditor that files a contingent claim specifically reserving right to jury trial has submitted to bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction
- we can affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record, even if the district court did not rely on that basis
- creditor who has filed a contingent claim couched in “protective language” still “has submitted to the bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction and waived any Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
- Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County
- denial of motion for reconsideration
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 86 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.