Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Phelps v. Sovran Bank

507 U.S. 1024

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-04-05
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a public trial had been violated when the defendant's family members and possibly some press had been excluded from the courtroom while permitting in the courtroom prospective jurors, witnesses, and courtroom personnel
  • “[A] trial judge is ordinarily in a uniquely superior position to gauge the potential for prejudice in a particular case, and therefore to determine whether a mistrial is appropriate or required.”
  • except in its offensive nonmutual incarnation, collateral estoppel is not a discretionary doctrine “in the sense that the tribunal asked to apply it has a free-swinging, uncanalized discretion to apply it or not”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Phelps v. Sovran Bank. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
25 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.