Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Curators, University of Missouri v. Sullivan

506 U.S. 953

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-11-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that an exaction of incriminating statements from a member of the public in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966
  • sustaining a § 1983 action against police officers even though the plaintiffs coerced statements were not used at any proceeding
  • sustaining a § 1983 action against police officers even though the plaintiff's coerced statements were not used at any proceeding
  • statutory language implementing Constitutional directive to conduct decennial census is so nondirective that there may be no law to apply to case alleging census bureau inaccuracy
  • “agency decisions are set aside only if they are ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.’ ”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Curators, University of Missouri v. Sullivan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
60 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.