Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

506 U.S. 1021

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-12-07
Topic
employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that cases raised question whether a private suit under RICO may be brought against a utility to recover for excessive charges for electrical power
  • the rationale underlying the filed rate doctrine applies "whether the rate at issue has been set by a state rate-making authority or a federal one”
  • “where such party shows the kind of conflict of interest that could realistically be expected to bias the decision makers, [Firestone] counsels in favor of withholding deference”
  • “anyone urging that a court disregard [a reservation of discretionary authority by the plan] has the burden of showing some reason to believe the exercise of discretion has been tainted”
  • “this principle, [which is central to the filed rate doctrine] ..., applies with equal force to preclude recovery under RICO whether the rate at issue has been set by a state rate-making authority or a federal one”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
82 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.