Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic
Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic, 505 U.S. 1240 (1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-09-02
- Topic
- general
Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Blackmun joins, dissenting. In a statutory construction case that is important enough to merit reargument, the Court should err on the side of allowing full discussion of the entire statute at issue. Without having examined the supplemental brief attached to respondents’ motion, and noting the absence of any objection from petitioners, I would therefore allow it to be filed as a matter of course. Because I intend to read the entire supplemental brief in preparation for the reargument — despite the Court’s peculiar order — I would welcome comment by petitioners on all issues discussed therein.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
dissenting.
In a statutory construction case that is important enough to merit reargument, the Court should err on the side of allowing full discussion of the entire statute at issue. Without having examined the supplemental brief attached to respondents’ motion, and noting the absence of any objection from petitioners, I would therefore allow it to be filed as a matter of course. Because I intend to read the entire supplemental brief in preparation for the reargument — despite the Court’s peculiar order — I would welcome comment by petitioners on all issues discussed therein.