Pierre v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

How later courts describe this case

• "Federal courts owe due deference to an administrator's factual conclusions that reflect a reasonable and impartial judgment."
• administrator’s factual determinations receive deferential review despite absence of plan language conferring discretionary authority
• “Federal courts owe due deference to an administrator’s factual con elusions that reflect a reasonable and impartial judgment.”
• Justice White, dissenting from the denial of certiorari