Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ledet v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
502 U.S. 959
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-11-12
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- holding accomplice liability instruction sufficient when trial court separately explained to jury that specific intent to kill must be found to support first-degree murder conviction
- kidnapping conviction circumstantially proven where evidence demonstrated that victim was last seen leaving a bar with defendants, to whom he had offered a ride, and that his body was found in a wooded area some distance away
- district attorney’s comments that the defendants carved the victim up “like a cheap piece of tenderloin” merely summarized trial evidence with permissible oratorical flair
- photographs clearly depicting the victim’s slashed throat, open eye and other head injuries were admissible
- prosecutor’s comments about appellant that “[w]e’re here together with the coldness of heart, hard to believe, and with an evil intention of mind, ... and a coldness of disposition” were proper remarks which were not designed to inflame the passions of the jury
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ledet v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 62 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.