Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Estate of Van Tran v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.

502 U.S. 908

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-10-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that in order to grant a Rule 12(c) motion the court must determine beyond doubt that no facts support the plaintiff’s claim
  • holding remand based on a forum selection clause was not within Sec. 1447(c), hence reviewable, and proper
  • holding remand based on a forum selection clause was not within § 1447(c), hence reviewable, and proper
  • remand based upon forum selection clause is non-statutory and rests upon determination that clause has been violated
  • since “not all non-jurisdictional motions for remand are governed by the 30-day time limit,” a motion to remand made 54 days after removal based upon a forum selection clause is not covered by § 1447(c)

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Estate of Van Tran v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
99 opinions

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.