Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lambert v. Department of the Army

502 U.S. 860

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-10-07
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • grant of Rule 11 motion not res judicata with respect to state claim of malicious prosecution
  • denial of Rule 11 sanctions has no collateral estoppel effect in subsequent action for conspiracy, malicious prosecution, libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress
  • denial of Rule 11 sanctions has no collateral estoppel effect in subsequent action for damages based on conspiracy, malicious prosecution, libel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
  • “Legislators’ immunity is absolute, and extends to injunctive as well as to damages suits.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lambert v. Department of the Army. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
29 opinions

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.