Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hospital
Hayes v. Cmty. Gen. Osteopathic Hosp., 502 U.S. 1060 (1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-01-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims is not automatic, but “is a favored and normal course of action.”
- noting eases ruling that social security benefits should not be set off from ADEA lost wages award, although not reaching the issue
- all individuals must pay federal income tax on their wages, regardless of whether they have requested, obtained or exercised any privilege from the federal government
- enactment of various construction mora-toria, though it amounted to spot zoning, was protected by absolute immunity
- In an ADEA claim “[a] federal court’s exercise of pendent jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claims, while not automatic, is a favored and normal course of action.”
- affirming denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds
- affirm-ing denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds
- jury acted in advisory capacity only
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hospital. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 145 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.