Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Acuna Castillo v. Shell Oil Co.
502 U.S. 1049
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-01-13
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that defects in removal procedure include all non-jurisdictional defects, and concluding that plaintiffs waived any non-jurisdictional grounds for remand existing at time of removal by not moving to remand within 30 days of notice of removal
- noting that defects in removal procedure include all non-jurisdictional defects, and concluding that plaintiffs waived any non-jurisdictional gro unds for remand existing at time of removal by not moving to remand within 30 days of notice of removal
- objections to procedural defects in removal not voiced within the 30-day time period provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) are waived
- effective date of amendment to section 1447(c) is November 19, 1988, and in most cases, it applies to cases pending on this date
- thirty-day limit applies to all motions for remand not based on subject matter jurisdiction
- “section 1447(c) “requires remand on any ground other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction to be sought within 30 days of the filing of a notice of removal”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Acuna Castillo v. Shell Oil Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 79 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.