Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Acuna Castillo v. Shell Oil Co.

502 U.S. 1049

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-01-13
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that defects in removal procedure include all non-jurisdictional defects, and concluding that plaintiffs waived any non-jurisdictional grounds for remand existing at time of removal by not moving to remand within 30 days of notice of removal
  • noting that defects in removal procedure include all non-jurisdictional defects, and concluding that plaintiffs waived any non-jurisdictional gro unds for remand existing at time of removal by not moving to remand within 30 days of notice of removal
  • objections to procedural defects in removal not voiced within the 30-day time period provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) are waived
  • effective date of amendment to section 1447(c) is November 19, 1988, and in most cases, it applies to cases pending on this date
  • thirty-day limit applies to all motions for remand not based on subject matter jurisdiction
  • “section 1447(c) “requires remand on any ground other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction to be sought within 30 days of the filing of a notice of removal”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Acuna Castillo v. Shell Oil Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
79 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.