Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

GIBSON v. FLORIDA BAR Et Al.

502 U.S. 104

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-12-04
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GIBSON v. FLORIDA BAR Et Al.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
14 opinions
GIBSON v. FLORIDA BAR,502 U.S. 104(1991)
GIBSONv. FLORIDA BAR ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 90-1102
Argued November 6, 1991 — Decided December 4, 1991
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below:906 F.2d 624.
Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs wereHugh L. ReillyandHerbert R. Kraft.Barry Richardargued the cause and filed briefs for respondents.fn*
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.Page 105
  1. Page 104Anthony T. CasoandRonald A. Zumbrunfiled a brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation asamicus curiaeurging reversal.

    Briefs ofamici curiaewere filed for the National Education Association et al. byRobert H. Chanin,Bruce R. Lerner, andJeremiah A. Collins, for the State Bar of Wisconsin byJohn S. SkiltonandWilliam M. Conley, and for David P. Frankel et. al. byMr. Frankel, pro se, andJoseph W.Little. ↩