Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Wright v. West

502 U.S. 1021

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-12-18
Topic
labor-and-employment

C. A. 4th Cir. The order of December 16, 1991 [ante, p. 1012], granting the petition for writ of certiorari is amended as follows: Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are requested to brief and argue the following question: “In determining whether to grant a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court, should a federal court give deference to the state court’s application of law to the specific facts of the petitioner’s ease or should it review the state court’s determination de novo?” Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens dissent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wright v. West. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. The order of December 16, 1991 [ante, p. 1012], granting the petition for writ of certiorari is amended as follows: Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are requested to brief and argue the following question: “In determining whether to grant a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court, should a federal court give deference to the state court’s application of law to the specific facts of the petitioner’s ease or should it review the state court’s determination de novo?”

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens dissent.