Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Hansborough v. Indiana University Bloomington Board of Trustees

Hansborough v. Ind. U. (periodical titles) Bloomington Bd. of Trs., 502 U.S. 1006 (1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-12-09
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • upholding trial judge's denial of request to proceed pro se as a -spontaneous re: sponse to judge’s refusal to grant new counsel
  • Defendant’s statements were correctly interpreted as “indieat[ing] dissatisfaction with his attorney” rather than as unequivocally asserting his right to self-representation.
  • Defendant's statements were correctly interpreted as "indicat[ing] dissatisfaction with his attorney" rather than as unequivocally asserting his right to self-representation.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hansborough v. Indiana University Bloomington Board of Trustees. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.