Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tocco v. New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing

499 U.S. 937

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-03-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding dismissal of plaintiffs claim is appropriate where complaint contains only eonclusory allegations of a violation of a Constitutional right
  • allowing recovery of attorneys' fees and litigation costs by private party CERCLA plaintiff
  • complaints based on violation of constitutional right must contain more than conclusory allegation to avoid dismissal
  • plaintiff, a former owner of the site, entered into consent decree with state agency and others to cleanup a site prior to plaintiffs section 107(a) claim against another PRP
  • plaintiff, a former owner of a site, entered into a consent decree with a state agency and others to clean up a site prior to plaintiff's § 107(a) action against another PRP
  • input of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR
  • NCP specifically contemplates excavations as appropriate removal actions
  • listing eases on both sides of controversy

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tocco v. New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
115 opinions

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.