Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Moore v. Regents of the University of California

Moore v. Regents of the U. (periodical titles) of Cal., 499 U.S. 936 (1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-03-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • recognizing a lighter burden for employers of firefighters
  • "Because the money paid by the settling defendants and recovery from Mmahat overlap, we feel Mmahat should get credit for the amount paid"
  • actions by debtor savings and loan’s general counsel urging corporation to make improper loans so he could earn fees was defalcation while in a fiduciary relationship.
  • breaches of fiduciary duty of attorney/board member for failed financial institution, in advising board to make improvident loans from which his law firm made substantial fees in transactions, gave rise to debt nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4)
  • suit against general counsel of failed savings & loan
  • refusing to apply property law to cells and bodily tissues

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moore v. Regents of the University of California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
58 opinions

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.