Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kern River Gas Transmission Co. v. Coastal Corp.

Kern River Gas Transmission Co. v. Coastal Corp., 498 U.S. 952 (1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-10-29
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • upon failing to establish one element, court refused to consider whether movant met remaining elements of prima facie case
  • copyright on map indicating proposed corridor of gas pipeline denied because idea of gas pipeline corridor could not be expressed in any other meaningful way and copyright would therefore allow monopoly on idea
  • "To extend protection ... would be to grant Kem River a monopoly of the idea for locating a proposed pipeline in the chosen corridor, a foreclosure of competition that Congress could not have intended to sanction through copyright law_”
  • petition for writ of mandamus denied

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kern River Gas Transmission Co. v. Coastal Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
12 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Motions of Wide World of Maps, Inc., and Automobile Club of America for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.