Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

J. J. Blonien & Associates, Inc. v. Community Newspapers, Inc.

498 U.S. 941

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-10-29
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that pleading with particularity “[m]eans the who, what, when, where, and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.”
  • requiring the pleader to provide the equivalent of a “first paragraph of any newspaper story”
  • “Fees for two years' audits could not approach the losses E & W would suffer from a perception that it would muffle a client's fraud.”
  • accountant under no legal duty to blow whistle on client upon discovery that client was in financial trouble
  • investors must point to some fact suggesting that [the] difference [between favorable projections and actual health] is attributable to fraud
  • "People sometimes act irrationally, but indulging ready inferences of irrationality would too easily allow the inference that ordinary business reverses are fraud”
  • “‘[C]ircumstances’ must be pleaded in detail. This means the who, what, when, where, and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.”
  • "[T]he complaint ... must afford a basis for believing that plaintiffs could prove scienter."

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed J. J. Blonien & Associates, Inc. v. Community Newspapers, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
175 opinions

Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.