Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
J. J. Blonien & Associates, Inc. v. Community Newspapers, Inc.
498 U.S. 941
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-10-29
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that pleading with particularity “[m]eans the who, what, when, where, and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.”
- requiring the pleader to provide the equivalent of a “first paragraph of any newspaper story”
- “Fees for two years' audits could not approach the losses E & W would suffer from a perception that it would muffle a client's fraud.”
- accountant under no legal duty to blow whistle on client upon discovery that client was in financial trouble
- investors must point to some fact suggesting that [the] difference [between favorable projections and actual health] is attributable to fraud
- "People sometimes act irrationally, but indulging ready inferences of irrationality would too easily allow the inference that ordinary business reverses are fraud”
- “‘[C]ircumstances’ must be pleaded in detail. This means the who, what, when, where, and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.”
- "[T]he complaint ... must afford a basis for believing that plaintiffs could prove scienter."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed J. J. Blonien & Associates, Inc. v. Community Newspapers, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 175 opinions
Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.