Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Audinot v. United States

498 U.S. 866

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-10-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause may be triggered when a “civil penalty ... rose to the level of criminal punishment because of the lack of rational relation to the Government’s loss”
  • assessment of $1,791,100 in civil penalties based upon same conduct as criminal proceedings in civil action for filing false medicare claims remanded to the district court for a Halper analysis
  • order of proceedings, civil and criminal, does not effect double jeopardy application
  • the Halper principle applies whether civil penalty or criminal punishment comes first

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Audinot v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
21 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.