Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority
498 U.S. 1120
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-02-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that appealability relates to an order's enforceability, not its adherence to Rule 65(d)
- providing a detailed discussion of the differing ripeness analyses depending on the constitutional theories involved and the remedies that a plaintiff is seeking
- deeming a broad construction of the term “use” as appropriate where the benefit derived by the user depended on the existence of the entire airport facility
- dividing theories into three: just compensation, due process takings and arbitrary and capricious due process
- “[I]f there is no dispute over the meaning of a contract, there is nothing for [the arbitrators] to do”
- "there is a considerable question, though again one not necessary to decide, concerning the district court’s power to order arbitration.”
- what the railroad is allowed to do is the status quo even if the railroad has not been doing it
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 109 opinions
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.