Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority

498 U.S. 1120

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-02-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that appealability relates to an order's enforceability, not its adherence to Rule 65(d)
  • providing a detailed discussion of the differing ripeness analyses depending on the constitutional theories involved and the remedies that a plaintiff is seeking
  • deeming a broad construction of the term “use” as appropriate where the benefit derived by the user depended on the existence of the entire airport facility
  • dividing theories into three: just compensation, due process takings and arbitrary and capricious due process
  • “[I]f there is no dispute over the meaning of a contract, there is nothing for [the arbitrators] to do”
  • "there is a considerable question, though again one not necessary to decide, concerning the district court’s power to order arbitration.”
  • what the railroad is allowed to do is the status quo even if the railroad has not been doing it

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
109 opinions

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.