Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Teagardener v. Republic-Franklin Inc. Pension Plan
498 U.S. 1027
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-01-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the district court on 12(b)(6) motion properly considered contract documents where contract and the “arguable meanings of its terms, were central to the plaintiffs’ complaint”
- “Only “participants” and “beneficiaries”, as those terms are defined under ERISA, have standing to pursue claims for benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1332( a)(l)(B).”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Teagardener v. Republic-Franklin Inc. Pension Plan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 30 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.