Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.

Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc., 496 U.S. 943 (1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-06-18
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • recognizing that the fear experienced by the victim before death is a significant factor in determining the existence of this aggravating circumstance
  • recognizing difference between defendant’s knowing that product may run into snags and knowing it has already developed problems so significant as to require months of delay
  • this court may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any ground fairly supported by the record
  • “There is a difference between knowing that any product in development may run into a few snags and knowing that a particular product has already developed problems. ...”
  • unusual insider trading activity during class period may permit inference of bad faith and scienter
  • “Insider trading in suspicious amounts or at suspicious times is probative of bad faith and scienter.”
  • "in a fraud on the market case, defendant's failure to disclose material information may be excused where that information has been made credibly available to the market by other sources"
  • “[Projections and general expressions of optimism may be actionable under the federal securities laws.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
209 opinions

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioners for leave to intervene in order to file a petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.