Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.
Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc., 496 U.S. 943 (1990)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-06-18
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- recognizing that the fear experienced by the victim before death is a significant factor in determining the existence of this aggravating circumstance
- recognizing difference between defendant’s knowing that product may run into snags and knowing it has already developed problems so significant as to require months of delay
- this court may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any ground fairly supported by the record
- “There is a difference between knowing that any product in development may run into a few snags and knowing that a particular product has already developed problems. ...”
- unusual insider trading activity during class period may permit inference of bad faith and scienter
- “Insider trading in suspicious amounts or at suspicious times is probative of bad faith and scienter.”
- "in a fraud on the market case, defendant's failure to disclose material information may be excused where that information has been made credibly available to the market by other sources"
- “[Projections and general expressions of optimism may be actionable under the federal securities laws.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 209 opinions
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioners for leave to intervene in order to file a petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.