Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Carvalho v. "Andrea C"

493 U.S. 993

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-12-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • subsequent events may show relevance of prior conduct to conspiracy
  • a successive petition raises claims that are identical to claims previously raised and rejected on the merits in a prior federal habeas corpus petition, whereas “a petition that raises a ground for relief not raised in the prior petition is analyzed as an ‘abuse of the writ.’ ”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carvalho v. "Andrea C". The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
63 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.