Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
In re Sparks
493 U.S. 963
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-11-13
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that results of polygraph test proffered by defendant were inadmissable at the guilt phase and the sentencing phase of a capital murder trial
- holding term "deliberately" sufficiently clear to permit jury to decide the first Texas capital sentencing special issue
- potential jurors who indicate they would automatically vote for the death penalty for every eligible defendant must be excluded when challenged for cause
- "A veniremember who believes that the death penalty should automatically be imposed in every capital case should be excused."
- potential jurors who indicated they would automatically vote for death penalty for every eligible defendant must be excluded *Page 476 when challenged for cause
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Sparks. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 175 opinions
Petition for writ of mandamus denied.