Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.
493 U.S. 959
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-11-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- concluding that coiporation was successor in interest to sole proprietorship
- noting that under Rule 23(b)(2) absent class members are bound without notice
- affirming power of bankruptcy court to enjoin suits permanently against nondebt-ors in a plan, where there existed certain indemnification rights against the debtor
- contingent claims are liquidated according to estimation provision, 11 U.S.C. § 502(c), which calculates aggregate liabilities
- affirming approval of class settlement resolving claims of class members with unmanifested symptoms of disease resulting from use of the Dalkon Shield
- granting class certification to victims of asbestos related diseases and appointing a representative for persons exhibiting injuries in the future
- affirming approval of class settlement resolving claims of class members with unmanifested symptoms of disease resulting from use of the Daikon Shield
- “nothing contained in this Section 8.05 is intended to confer jurisdiction upon the Court over, or grant authority to monitor, the day-to-day operations of the Trusts or the Claims Resolution Facility”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 206 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Denied.
Justice WHITE would grant certiorari.