Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.

493 U.S. 959

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-11-06
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • concluding that coiporation was successor in interest to sole proprietorship
  • noting that under Rule 23(b)(2) absent class members are bound without notice
  • affirming power of bankruptcy court to enjoin suits permanently against nondebt-ors in a plan, where there existed certain indemnification rights against the debtor
  • contingent claims are liquidated according to estimation provision, 11 U.S.C. § 502(c), which calculates aggregate liabilities
  • affirming approval of class settlement resolving claims of class members with unmanifested symptoms of disease resulting from use of the Dalkon Shield
  • granting class certification to victims of asbestos related diseases and appointing a representative for persons exhibiting injuries in the future
  • affirming approval of class settlement resolving claims of class members with unmanifested symptoms of disease resulting from use of the Daikon Shield
  • “nothing contained in this Section 8.05 is intended to confer jurisdiction upon the Court over, or grant authority to monitor, the day-to-day operations of the Trusts or the Claims Resolution Facility”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
206 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Denied.

Justice WHITE would grant certiorari.