Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York
493 U.S. 871
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-10-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirming trial court ruling that confusing similarity may exist between infringer’s use of "No-Twist” on "C" clamps and protected user's "Kant-Twist”
- vacating reinstatement of pilot who was found to have flown commercial plane while intoxicated
- vacating arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated
- affirming decision of district court which set aside an arbitration award clearly violating public policy where arbitration award ordered reinstatement of a pilot who had been discharged after he had flown a passenger plane while intoxicated
- vacating an arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated
- "An arbitrator's result may be wrong; it may appear unsupported; it may appear poorly reasoned; it may appear foolish. Yet, it may not be subject to court interference"
- award which reinstated pilot who flew while intoxicated was struck down
- denied reinstatement to pilot who flew passenger plane while intoxicated
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 114 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.Reported below: 860 F. 2d 1145.