Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York

493 U.S. 871

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • affirming trial court ruling that confusing similarity may exist between infringer’s use of "No-Twist” on "C" clamps and protected user's "Kant-Twist”
  • vacating reinstatement of pilot who was found to have flown commercial plane while intoxicated
  • vacating arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated
  • affirming decision of district court which set aside an arbitration award clearly violating public policy where arbitration award ordered reinstatement of a pilot who had been discharged after he had flown a passenger plane while intoxicated
  • vacating an arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated
  • "An arbitrator's result may be wrong; it may appear unsupported; it may appear poorly reasoned; it may appear foolish. Yet, it may not be subject to court interference"
  • award which reinstated pilot who flew while intoxicated was struck down
  • denied reinstatement to pilot who flew passenger plane while intoxicated

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
114 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 860 F. 2d 1145.