Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Burrell v. City of Los Angeles

493 U.S. 1043

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-01-16
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • failed attempt to offset subordinated capital debentures of insolvent bank against recovery sought by FDIC on behalf of insolvent bank
  • "Appellants have made no effort to provide us with a statement envisioned by Fed.R.App.P. 10(c), and it is the responsibility of counsel ... to insure that a complete record is available for our review”
  • setoff inappropriate where debentures not mutually extinguishable with notes “because the debentures were specifically made subordinate to the claims of all other depositors and creditors of the bank”
  • no setoff against claim by FDIC where writing requirement was not met
  • "A conspiracy to rig bids may be an agreement among competitors about ... who should be the successful bidder ... or who should refrain from bidding ... that affects, limits, or avoids competition among them."

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Burrell v. City of Los Angeles. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
80 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.