Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Algoma Steel Corp. v. United States

Algoma Steel Corp. v. United States, 492 U.S. 919 (1989)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-07-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • observing that reversal of convictions is required if instructions “could have led the jury to convict for conduct outside the proscription of the mail fraud statute”
  • joinder proper where common factual questions allow the jury to draw consistent conclusion regarding facts relevant to separate counts
  • erroneous instruction on essential element of crime is constitutional error subject to harmless beyond a reasonable doubt test
  • "[a]s a condition precedent to a summary process action, proper notice to quit is a jurisdictional necessity"
  • motion to reconsider denial of new trial allowed for intervening change in law when filed prior to final judgment
  • newspapers had First Amendment right of access after trial and verdict to juror identities
  • court can consider pleadings and affidavits and take other evidence in determining subject matter jurisdiction
  • a district court must engage in de novo review where a party has objected to a magistrate’s decision

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Algoma Steel Corp. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
159 opinions

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.